Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Nathuram Godse - His Last Speech

JANUARY 30th, 1949 - The Mahatma was assassinated by a man called Naturam Godse.
After he shot him, instead of running away, he stood his ground and surrounded.
He said, "No one should think that Gandhi was killed by a madman"

One of the best speeches of All time, which is compared to Socrates's speech in his trial.

The Judge was astonished by his speech and commented that if India had followed the Jury system of giving judgments, Godse would have been adjudicated as "Not Guilty" by the Jury, cause after the speech, the whole audience was in tears.

This is the speech given by Nathuram Godse in the court in his last trial for the murder of Mahatma Gandhi


Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession. I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other.



I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Nairoji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and' Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.



All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well being of all India, one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.



Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji's influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence, which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.



In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical, as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them.



The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very well in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.



Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with, as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster.



Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and crossbreed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma's sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.



From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork.



The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism, secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' - whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country - which we consider a deity of worship - my mind was filled with direful anger.



One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.



Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless.



Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.



I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots.



I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi. I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi's persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims.



I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.


-NATHURAM GODSE

(c)The blogger has no copyright over the speech material, but over the compilation of the matter and the Whole article as such

109 comments:

Yajna... Going beyond the horizon said...

The only thing that made me sad that there is no comment for such truth described. People of India should get awake and should know the hidden truth like this. I am proud to be a first person to comment on this truth.

vishal said...

sad to know i'm yet only the second person to have posted a comment even though the speech has been said around 60 years back and is the best speech i have ever read...most of us indians are blinded by the goodness of gandhi but in reality he was the cause of the condition our country was forced into.

kinjal said...

sad tht tis message din gain as much popularity as it shud hav...i m nt anti-gandhi..bt i strongly support wateva godse hs said..most of us..indians..take godse..as he said.."a madman" .. readin his speech..d misconception can b eradicated..plz pass on this message n let people know the truth..

vikas said...

We Indians are blind behind one men so called Mahatma Gandhi, I really wish if every Indian read this article and come to know the actual fact. Now I can correlate why Gandhi condemned Chauri Chauri case which was the outcome of Jaliawala Bagh Masscare because gandhi did not have feeling for those innocent who killed in Jaliawala Bagh, he was upset because some patriot Indians killed british officers (in Chauri Chauri case) and Gandhi did not want britishers to be killed. I think we Indian and in particular Hindus are called bloded, see from the past Mughals came and invaded us and we forgave them, britishers came and we were slave for 100 yrs and we forgave them, now we are becoming psuedo secular and forgiving our netas who are palying dirty politics and indirectly allowing terrorist to make their hold in India simply politicians are doing this to save their vote bank and to enjoy power even at the cost of our nation.
Comeon india wake up.

Aparna Sivapurapu said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
india this week said...

I believe that we all live in a democratic country and each one of us has right to express views.

But when i saw comments on this article made by 3-4 guys iiii really got aghast....
I am a Hindu guy but before that i am a human bieng....
A human bieng for whom humanity is bigger than any religion , caste or creed...
The speech made by Mr. Nathuram Godse was more or less Anti - Muslim...He don't have any problem with Mr. Gandhi ....
but he was against Muslims..

Mr Gandhi had devoted his whole life for the cause of the nation ...
may be his route to freedom was different from others...
and people like Mr. Godse had never realized that he fought for the people for INDIA ....
India which consist of Hindus as well as Muslims....

I really want all of you guys to think beyond such speeches....
We youth of this nation can change the way people think....
So please don't support such speeches.........

FIGHTERPILOTANATTITUDE said...

Relegion today is a concept for fools twisted by knaves to serve their selfish needs. Our religion should be unity of mankind, not its division. Our relegion should be gaining knowledge not distorting it. Our relegion should be to protect the weak, not trample them. Our relegion should be to stand up for UNITY of Mankind. Last but not the least Relegion is a personal business not to be discussed in public.

Poulasteshwarapuram said...

some how gadse openions may be correct gandhi jee may not be totally responsoble for that Mr.nehru played vital role about paritioning.
we have to blame nehru rather than gandhi.
nehru is cheater and i don't have any inhibitions to certify him.

Poulasteshwarapuram said...

yeah some how gadse openinons may be correct but gandhijee may not be responsibe for unfortunately what has happened.nehru played the vital role in happenings of all there incidents.
he is cheater i dont have any inhibitions to certify him

tweety said...

i read the speech it is marvellous...i appreciate the discloser of facts on the part of the blogger but..i never accept nathuram's action because(1) NO ONE SHOULD TAKE LAW in hes/her hands(2)godse could have campaigned against gandhi or could have formed a pressure group against gandhi and there were many other options.....if killing was the most appropriate option then, WHY HE DID NOT KILL JINNAH? WHY HE DID NOT RAISE HIS VOICE AGAINST GANDHI WHEN THE BLUNDER WAS TAKING PLACE....?

tweety said...

i read the speech it is marvellous...i appreciate the discloser of facts on the part of the blogger but..i never accept nathuram's action because(1) NO ONE SHOULD TAKE LAW in hes/her hands(2)godse could have campaigned against gandhi or could have formed a pressure group against gandhi and there were many other options.....if killing was the most appropriate option then, WHY HE DID NOT KILL JINNAH? WHY HE DID NOT RAISE HIS VOICE AGAINST GANDHI WHEN THE BLUNDER WAS TAKING PLACE....?

akhil said...

Since I have read the same stuff with same title and different content every time, the authenticity of the speech is doubtful. It seems that every time an anti-Gandhi blogger, adds his own comments and views and inflates the whole story.

Neither am I anti-gandhi, nor am I pro-gandhi. I would just say that one should read more about partition of India, history of India freedom struggle and other issues related to it to completely understand the situation. Most of the people are rational enough to understand and decipher the situation themselves.

Sam said...

I think India should adopt policy of non-violence with Pakistan and China. India should give up Kashmir...then Punjab...then......
Kashmir lete hai to Punjab bhi do..
If anybody thinks this speech is fake..please read "Men who killed Gandhi" by Manohar Malgonkar. It has more detailed actual court document copy pasted in it. It is also true that Jusdge Khosla made the comment that had the people in the court made the decision, they would have come up with decision of "not guilty". It is easy for many people to say non-violence. But when millions of Hindus were raped (women were sold like cows), murdered etc...and Mahatma Gandhi did not go on fast to stop that..Why? becasue he knew that Muslims wont care..They would have said marta hai to marne do..who the heck cares...

Interestingly Father of Undivided India Nathuram Godse was a great believer in Gandhji's non-coperation movememnt and participated in it also. He had great respect for Gandhiji and hence he bowed to him as a mark of respect before shooting. (all this is mentioned in various books on Gandhiji and Nathuram) .
Another important thing that turned the tide was the acceptance of Indian government to give Pakistan 55 crores due to Gandhiji's fast..This was when Indian army was fighting with Pakistan for Kashmir..Imagine giving money to the same country you are at war with!!!!

Please read/know the facts before making any comments either pro/against Gandhi.

Jai Akhand Hind..

Roshan said...

The sad news is that we indians are still under the power of slavery. Democracy claimed by leaders is enjoyed by them only.

piyush said...

People,
If you look back at the history of Gandhi, you will find, he was never against England. In fact, he was impressed and he wanted India to develop as England and so he wanted Britishers in India. All the movements (except the last one) he made was for Indians to be treated better and with more respect but never wanted Freedom.
Secondly, he always wanted to be THE FATHER OF NATION, a status beyond anything a man can ever achieve. The reason he didn't supported extremists was if he will support them, they will be the hero NOT him.
Another point, have you guys ever thought how Gandhi became so popular. The reason is Britishers promoted him. They knew his policies will not effect them much and will keep Indians believe that they are fighting.
Finally, I feel ashamed to say this but logically speaking India got independence not because of anything what we Indian did but what a German mother f**king Dictator did. It's world war 2 that gave us freedom, not anything Gandhi did.

pradeesh said...

basicaly india is a hndu oriented nation,so we must give the firstconsideration eor hindus,now i realize that was also a great patriotic man having a great vission about our country................... great godse, great

Gautam said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
the great said...

before reading this speech i only respect Godse bcoz he killed that person (Gandhi)whom I hated most,but now i only wnt to say that godse was a real hero of india bcoz on that time when indians were blind follower of gandhi he took that much big step only for saving india .

Nishant said...

Well, I have come across many people who do Gandhi bashing at the drop of a hat, including our 'Behenji'. But I myself am a great admirer of the man. I respect him for what all he did. More than anything, he gave India a scrupulous start. Look at Pakistan and you'd know what I mean. A country founded on wrong principles is bound to fail like Pak is failing now.
I am not denying that the man was correct in everything he said and done. I also feel that if we had gotten independence Bose style, India today would have been different. But didn't Bose went and made a pact with the greatest Monster of all times, Hitler himself? Every man has his failings, even Gandhi had his. But he provided a direction.

Talking of heroes and divided/undivided India, what was India? Was India ever united? Neither was it united in the Ramayana times, nor during Mahabharta, nor before the Mughals came. India had always been a group of princely states! What partition are we talking about here?
It all about perspective. I would rather count on all the good men like Gandhi, Patel, Bose, Bhagat Singh did. TO comment upon the crazy times 65 years later sitting in an A/C room is perhaps the easiest thing to do.

jitendra singh baghel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
jitendra singh baghel said...

guys,this is the true side of godse which remain hidden for d past 60 years,its sad on the part of every indian to ignore such an important evidence for Godse's innocence and calling him a "madman".May he rest in peace.

ravi said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ravi said...

No one be sad..We dnt have a gandhi today but have more young guns like Godse and Savarkar and we are here..!!
Beware Mr. Rahul so called Gandhi..

sumit said...

i think still there are lot of things...hidden...i m really very much excited about what i have read....i think that every person should have a good knowledge about this subject...i must say it is best written speech i ever think of....

whose line is it anyway said...

I believe killing is not a end reult. Gdse should have tried appealing to the maases in a more intellligent way by expaiing his view point and shring his though with the maases who felt the same for Ghandi. It really mattrs the way you approach an issue. An approach like this merely proves an act on insecurity an cowardness to face the truth and challenge the untruth.

JayaBidkar said...

Thanks for sharing. Not many people are aware of this side of the story.

Satyajeet Kumar said...

desh prem sarvopari and nothing.............proud of the thought of true patriot...........jai hind

chandni bahri said...

gandhi is responsible for creatin sumtin dat will make generations to come face d demons of death and terror.... dere is no doubt dat he created pakistan and d division.... thanx 2 which both d countries r still sufferin... men have died from both countries fightin a lost battle..... in d end both d countries suffer and wars keep raging...

Suman Kumar said...

Suman Reddy,
I dont say Gandhiji is a culprit of all the darkness of Indian history prior independence. But we should understand onething. No matter how Great a person is, applaud him for his god deeds and equally criticise him, if he had committed any mistakes.One can clearly sniff the illegitimate advantage gandhi had taken at the cost of innocent HINDUS. Its not that Godse was against Muslims, he was against the misdeeds of the muslims. People should know the history before speaking for or against Gandhi. Godse was not an insane person. He was an intellectual with a sound Ideology except for that crime he committed.
Kudos to Godse... Jai Bharath, Jai Hind!!

Neil said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anish said...

In spite of being a hindu, i believe, that the speech delivered by Nathuram godse was brazenly targated towards the muslims. No one can deny the fact that in achiveing freedom for india mahatma gandhi has a lion share and this fact cannot be subvert by any desperate speeches.
Ideology of The Mahatma was right, and the same that Ram, Krishna, Buddha would have love to follow it themselves if there wrent any villains. To me this is what gandhiji failed to understand that there were to many villans around in form of Hindus and in form of muslims. He failed to realize that there wrent to many people who considered themselves humans.And so every decision Gandhiji made may not be good for the nation given the practicality of the situation. But is Gandhiji to be blamed for this or people like Godse and all of us who are against tolerance and secularisum.
With the intensity of voilence in the country today it is a common say "Y cant this be a voilence free society?" . This is exactly what Gandhiji wanted and fought for his entire life. It is the people to be blamed, NOT the MAHATMA.[y isnt Nathuram Godse being called mahatma even by the people who have supported him on this bolg?]
Its very disheartening to see that every one outside india respects the great man , but not all do that in India.

chirag said...

the speech is good , the man is well versed , dedicated to nation, but if he wanted something he should have done something to get i,
Gandhiji sacrificed so much not for power but for people, he did not wanted to be a leader, but he really followed truth and non violence to the extent never before,
Hats off for Gandhiji,
Partition of India is sad but it was not gandhi, it was mohammad ali,nehru,communal riots....
Nathram really did a wrong thing killing him.

aamir said...

No body should make up his mind after knowing only one side of the truth. may be all of us here dont know a shot of the history. All we know of Gandhi is what we have mugged up in that 300 words essay in primary school. The biggest problem here is that it doesnt have a gandhian counter arguement.

JustChill said...

Though I am not a big fan of Gandhi,I do feel that Nathuram missed something in Gandhi's understanding of Indians.
I feel the reason for Gandhi to allow Muslim to stay in this country was more to do with how Hindus would live with each other after partition.Knowing history of India,I am sure if no Muslims were allowed to stay in India -it would have got further divided in to several countries. Indians are cowered,spineless,mindless... creatures.I always wondered how handful of Britishers could rule this country for 350 years!!! Godse did not achieve anything by killing Gandhi!!! there were better targets than Gandhi..Britishers were not allowed by Gandhi in this country. Muslim population was because many Hindus converted them to fight against the cast base system of this country.
To day also this bureaucrats,politicians are using the same policies which East India Company practiced.Divide and rule, No Indian will ever come together to fight for their cause.Indians are coward , no self respect,burden on this earth.So many times I have been taunted for not getting up on national anthem.I laugh at the knowledge Indians carry.Hardly any Indian will know how this national anthem came in to existence!! does any Indian understands what it means?
Most Indian knows how corrupt these politicians,bureaucrats are-anyone have guts to stand for it..NONE I BET..
I think what Godse did was stupid.He should have studied history of this country for 30-40 times before doing such thing,holding Gandhi responsible for the state of this country at that time or time to come.He should have asked why India never united when Alexander came to invade India,Chanakyas efforts were laughed at that time-before Alexander came India was known as akhand Bharat but after him India saw series of invaders coming,why?One can keep writing -it is endless..
There is nothing great about what Nathuram did,he was stupid to have killed Gandhi because by than the damage was already done. Gandhi was not or is responsible for the state of this country.It is in our GENES to be stupid...Though I give respect to Gandhi for his efforts I feel Adolf Hitler was more responsible for India's freedom from British rule.

Namita said...

Huh..people say Gandhiji got us freedom... he is the father if Nation.. which nation.. a divided india...and that too which gave birth toa fight which will continue this this world exists!!
If Hindus and muslims couldn't co exist then do they co exist now..
and if at all they are managing somehow, they even could have managed without india being divided!! If this only ws destined why at all ws India divided..
Those who say Gandhi fought for nonviolence and truth...lets come to REALITY..FOR THOSE WHO JUST GIVE SPEECHES...it's easier to talk good.. but very difficult for those who face the harsh realities...imagine..people beaten up..killed like animals..women raped and murdered brutally...Gandhi ws far from all this...Bose dd a great job..coz he understood the pain of the peoeple....
We need to turn the pages of history and read any book..any book , we can easily know that India got independence due to World War 2 and not because of our dearest Gandhiji..

He was losing battle afer battle in the name of non voilence..
Why couldn't he stop the rage which took place as a result of partition..

thousands of Hindus died..
Did Gandhiji ever realise that one wrong decision took millions of lives.. and left them homeless...

We talk of secular state..
we are proud of it..
so y dd we divide india then??

If that's the way.. there should be no India..
It should be divided into 30 parts in the name of differnt states... because we all tend to fight sometime in the name of Biharis Marathis and bengalis....

Yes somebody said..Y can't Indians live in peace with truth and nonvoilence this was Gandhiji's motive...I say yes we can live but is it necessay to get us dividde!!

Mr Godse dd right coz he saved us from innumouros bad dicisions Ganhi would have taken if he had lived...Godse didn't think for himeself but Gandhi always wanted to be Father of nation..which he succeeded to become...and we are reaping the bitter fruits of his much to say SELFISH deeds...

Yajna... Going beyond the horizon said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Yajnavalkya said...

Namita... whatever you described, you are 100% true. Actually Subhash Chandra Bose did something to get freedom and Nathram Godse just saved the future of nation otherwise Gandhi would have destroyed the nation more and more in the name of Truth & Non-violence. People who are prasing Gandhi, I just want to ask them whether they have really ever turned the pages of history? Have they ever analysed the hidden truth deeply on those pages? If you would have then u might have not praised Gandhi. They have just heard from uneducated people of India since childhood because the wise words "Truth" & "Non-violence" sounds good. If it is so then Bhagat Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad are wrong on their way? Atleast they have sacrifised their life for the nation which Gandhi could never do. He has just blackmailed Hindus in name of hunger strike. He can't do anything more than hunger strike. This kind of blackmailing has given message to Indian citizen to introduce corruption. Analyse dude!! analyse.!! wake up!! read the hidden history, turn pages & you will know what blunders Gandhi has done and what he could have done if Nathuram would have not killed him. It was a necessity to kill him. When Nathram gave this speech, even the judge of the court said Nathuram is not wrong for such act. But he has to follow the law. Gandhi praisers.. read History, analyze n then comment.

rams said...

Well done, Namitaji, Rightly siad. This is kaliyug, real Mahatmas are regarded as demons and demons regarded as Mahatmas. Godse unnecessarily sacrificed his life for Hindus. Hindus never care about their religion. They always like parroting the oneliners, 'No voilence'. 'All religions are equal', Gandhi is god, Godse is devil. They keep uttering these things until one of their family members got converted by religious fanatics, or one of them gets killed for participating in a religious procession thats going from muslim dominated areas.

Godse is my hero. Down with Anti-Hindu Gandhi

Modern Rescue said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Modern Rescue said...

Lets all appreciate all those who brought in fredom to this country , appreciate and respect those who stand in our borders to protect our nation , respect our security forces internal and external , lets all pay our taxes duly , vote for a proper D& capable government which takes proper decisions for the interest of the nation and not for the interst of their own individual parties ad their interests. This is our country and we are all Indians. We all should be proud of being Indians. Let us Resprct Our National Leaders and wish them to give us the healtyh governsce.
Vande Mataram !!!

goutam said...

I am ashamed and feel sorry for those people who are aware of half truth, half history and advocates the heinous crime of a person like Nathuram who has no contribution for the society, who was a fanatic and with a mind of brutality. This is how unfortunate that these people are advocating the murder of a person who was beyond any religion.
The supporters of these people, who are using this blog and supporting the cause of a Killer like Nathuram are not only deadlier than Nathuram, but can be dangerous for the society and country as a whole also, if they don't read the full history.

I really feel sorry for all who support this, who has not read the Mountbaten plan, who does not know the historical happenning since Muslim Leage came into existence.

Albert Einstein was absolutely right that people in 21st century will not have the mindset to understand Gandhi.

Gandhi was not an ordinary man.

I challange openly to all those people for an open debate who can justify the brutal dids of the killer Nathuram...

I feel sorry for these people who....

goutam said...

Dear all, who are supporting the act of Nathuram...I think its time, you should support the acts of Taliban, Al-Qaida, SIMI,Hamas...you should support the Nazis...its time u should support all fanatics....HATS OFF TO ALL WHO SUPPORTS....the bastard killer Nathuram....good jobe dude...great thinking!!!!!!!!

Yajnavalkya said...

yeah gautam.. we r dangerous for the society n ur country.. thanks foe comparing nathuram n we advocates with taliban, nazis, simi bla bla bla.. n if u r mature enough, mind ur tongue how to use ur Mountbatten's language.. Nathram is not a bastard, nor I am intended to say Gandhi was a bastard... he couldnot took care of his own sons, how he could became a father of the nation. Mind ur languade dude n learn how to write in a blog!!

First u try to go to the hidden history. Don't comment without turning the pages of history.

linox said...

I want to let others know that....

AMERICA got its freedom only fighting the ruthless British troops...not begging.....now its a developed and the most power full country in the world....Gandhi did nothing except begging ...and till now we are begging....even after 60yrs .....
having more than 100 crore population and plenty of resources we are still developing......what u people want to say about this.....

Yajnavalkya said...

I agree to this point America got its freedom only using the weapon of war. If we go the history, Every nation has got its freedom only by fighting back. Except India.. n its 100% true we got freedom free of cost. Subash Chandra Bose didi the right job creating the Army to fight with britishers. Without giving blood, we can't get freedom. Mr. Gandhi used 100 millions of life to experiment with his truth and non-violence. He experimented at the cost of millions of life. He did the great job in South Africa but he created a indifferent attitude that he could do something great in India also. Truth & Non-violence are wise words to hear, but to get freedom, we need to drop our bloods. If today we would have followed his system of non-violence, then today pakistan would have occupied whole India. But Our Indian Army has used the weapon of war to fight back with pakistan in 1965, 1971 & 1999 Kargil war. Mr. Gandhi & his praisers should have understood the actual meaning of Non-violence. Every nation has to fight for its freedom. But we got freedom free of cost due to world war-2. Not by Any Gandhi...

raghavendra prasad said...

I am not understanding why a part of INDIA separated and formed as PAKISTAN?
Who is the real mastermind behind this? History is History.
Now I don't want to merge PAKISTAN, Even it is unbelievable idea.
Lets forget all our wrong steps taken by our great bad leaders in 1940's and as a INDIA in 20th century develop with real DEMOCRATIC, SECULAR than ever.

omadinathom said...

I feel disappointed after reading comments and not the speech. Most have commented on gandhiji just by reading this speech, it is one side story only. For rational, and fair views it is necessary to study in depth conditions prevailing in 20th century till independence.There is much more into it than presented here.Be fair to have enough knowledge before making comments on great personalities

omadinathom said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Katti Narahari said...

With due respects to all the commments, I have but a simple question. If gandhi was still alive when Pakistan attacked kashmir (first time) in the guise of tribals, would India have replused the attack? Something tells me Gandhi would have gone on fast to prevent indian armed forces to retaliate!

Dr.Ranjit S said...

We need now thousands of Nathuram Godse to get the glory of India back in its original form! Gandhi -Nehru -Indra are responsible for the mess made with Pakistan in Kashmir,Punjab,and rest of of India. The average Indian worried with earning a bread and butter for his family..No one ever tell the TRUTH ..our Nation is based on ! All currupt,immoral politicians deserve the same end as of Gandhi.!

ajay said...

I,advocate "NON VOILANCE" as a mean of protest at the same time use of "FORCE" as the last resort:but "FORCE" not to be used in any kind of protest,its only to be used to defend oneself from aggression.

Nathu Ram ji is correct,being against "MUSLIM SATIATION" rather any kind of SATIATION is wrong for the wellbeing of a nation.

What he did was his choice due to the circumstances, its tought to say if he was wrong or rite though.

swisssam said...

I feel Godse was the Biggest Patriot, India has ever seen or produced. In the history of India his name will remain & shine forever. I truly feel what Godse did was in the interest of India. No man can be above the Nation even though the man could be Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Surely Gandhi can be called or must be called the Father of Pakistan and not M.A. Jinnah,who according to me was the most Brilliant Indian too.

Godse, for me is the person in the REAL TERM along with M.A.Jinnah are the REAL " BHARAT RATTAN'S'

Ashok said...

Gandhi's name has been so popularized that few people venture in to trying to find the truth. Hindus has become so tolerant that they have gone to become weak thinking that it is a strength. Being not an organised religion, which is their strength has also become their weakness. Renunciation can come only out of strength. When things are snatched under his nose, and when there is no protest from him, it is taken as generosity, renunciation etc but actually it shows his inability to stop such injustice.

typepad said...

Britain was left with no choice but to give freedom to Indian subcontinent due to World WAR II. To think Churchill melt coz of Gandhi non violence is to live in fools paradise.

To subvert N.Godse speech was inevitable Nehru was afraid or he may become a hero.

As far as why Godse killed Gandhi was due to Nehru/Gandhi policy of appeasement.

Secularism does not mean to please Minorities but it means to have freedom to practice their faith.


In fact the time has come to change defintion of Minority. Real minorities are Sikhs, jains and Christians and many SC in India

The present political system wont go after the above minorities as they dont have voting patterns such as muslims. Muslims vote en bloc hence the appeasement policy.

It's not that the muslims have benefitted due to appeasment policies they are as bad /good as the larger Indian community.

The issues of minorities have to go as there are equally poor /impoverished people in other community.There should be general policy where everyone who wants can progress.

Sukanti Pritnanda(Pooja) said...

Ultimate speech..loved it..great job..:)

MD said...

Ones life is really meaningless if this is not read by them. This is just THE BEST speech i have ever heard of. Really great job.

Namrat Gaonkar said...

Few people know that in 1938 Subhas Chandar Bose was legally and ethically elected to the Presidentship of the Indian National Congress.Gandhi according to his own whims and fancies in tandem with Nehru went on fast and Bose quit the INC in disgust.Why did he employ his ''terror '' tactic of fast unto death every time his actions were questioned?Who had given him this right?Even while handing over 65 crores to Pakistan he was the culprit when he went on fast to secure this transaction which Indians are ruing till this day.
This attitude was the precise reason why Tilak,Savarkar and Bose were against this maverick.
Godse made only one bloody mistake do you know what? He should have gunned this fella long back.

Ashraf said...

FOOLISH SPEECH

In the starting of speech Nathu quotes he is SECULAR. But throughout his speech he shows his ANGER about Gandhi and Congress giving comfort to Muslims.

START OF SPEECH:
"As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious."

NATHU's FOOLISH ANGER:
1. "it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India."
2. "But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India".
3. "The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims."
4. "From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus."
5. "the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi"
6."which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims."
7."by Gandhi's persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims"

THANK GOD PEOPLE WHO READ THIS SPEECH ARE NOT AS FOOLISH AS HIM.

srimathi ravikumar said...

Godse should have had a good level of courage for this..
I seriously believe in his speech, for the whole action of gandhi refusing the post was jinnah and the whole hindusthani thing was bad.. but according to me godse should have not shot gandhi..he cannot decide for the country's future goodness out of his own believes and political ideas..

kash said...

More n more people should know this......

ketan said...

JAI SHREERAAMMMMMMM... JAI NATHURAAMMMMMMMMM...

ketan said...

JAI SHREERAMMM ... JAI NATHURAMMM ...

kranthi kumar said...

Gandhi was not killed by a madman , i belive it

Camper said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Camper said...

No one should forget what happened to Veer Bhagat Singh and others because of Gandhi.

So gandhi was to die and he did Also don't refer him as mahatma what he wasn't

Though they should have killed nehru also
I want blogger to write truth of nehru the bas****

ye hindustan hai meri jaan said...

I am serching about Nathuram Godse but my badluck that i was far away from his statement.I knew only that he killed Mahatma Gandhi.But today i am proud of him.

we all need H I T S ----->> said...

can anyone answer a question ...

The only Viceroy and Governor-General of India who was killed by an indian patriot .....what was name of Viceroy n Patriot ????........

Vatsala Raina said...

Dividing india was not the correct decision..and if it was then declaring india a hindu country should have been done..
Gandhi use to practism Bhramcharya and while conducting his experiments he ..its better if you guys search the internet..
search about gandhi ji's experiments on bhramcharya..you'll know the truth

dsilvamartina said...

Gandhi was a backstabber...He showed Indians he was on their side but he did nothing to avoid thousands of them getting killed....He taught evrybody to get tortured and be submissive whereas he should hv taught them to stand what they believe in....Instead of being partial towards a few losing their lives he should have voiced his anger whenevr a single soul got killed...Its true that we have been taught to be a victim and bear the misdeeds others commit against us....India was such a rich country and becoz of gandhis non violence we lost evrythn to a bunch of jerks who took advantage of our naive attitude...His speech is definately an eye opener....

Nachiketh said...

let us join together and erase the memory of gandhi from our national life

teja said...

Gandhi is not the father of our Nation but a bastard of our nation. He did not have the Mardangi & opted to nonviolence.

He made Nehru one more Bastard & Mrss Mountbattens bed partner the PM as he has promised.

It is because of him we lost Bhagat singh & many more.

God knows when this Nehru family reign would end.

Rakesh Thakur said...

We badly need one more nathuram godse.. this time not to shoot anyone by himself but to teach all of us hindus that what all injustice this gandhi family as whole from pre independence to post independence have done in order to remain in power, for them the world is very small" Remain in Power, Say good words, Do best for your interest, Let nation deal with its problem by itself", lastly guys i see only one man in India who is current modern Nathuram Godse is Mr. Subramanian Swamy. You all are request to google and read more about him. Jai Hind.

Rakesh Thakur said...

We badly need one more nathuram godse.. this time not to shoot anyone by himself but to teach all of us hindus that what all injustice this gandhi family as whole from pre independence to post independence have done in order to remain in power, for them the world is very small" Remain in Power, Say good words, Do best for your interest, Let nation deal with its problem by itself", lastly guys i see only one man in India who is current modern Nathuram Godse is Mr. Subramanian Swamy. You all are request to google and read more about him. Jai Hind.

Abhishek said...

If someone would have dared to do the job before,the nation would have been freed from the british rules before the 1947 and may be in one piece! :sigh:
long live Godse!
Big F**K to Gandhi and his dynasty.

chetu said...

said....
I am 25 year old but now i can call myself a hindu. Godse is not a madman but he is only the 'man' of india.if i get the chance i want to be godse.The real hero and the indian father is only NATHURAM GODSE for me. Jay hind

cj said...

The truth behind the the MADMAN(Mahatama)is reveled by a intellectual person (Mr. Godse), i'll certainly forward this link to all i know and spread the awareness that Mr. Gnadhi was not the father of nation but indeed DESTROYER of our NATION (INDIA). to add few more line it was because of this madman, patriots like BHAGAT SINGH , SUKHDEV AND RAJGURU were hanged.

Archana said...

This godse is a strong hindutva guy and anti-muslim. It is true Mr.Gandhi tried to protect the muslims during riots after partition bcoz they were part of our country. Mahatma was an extreme patriot and he tried to save the people of India rather than saving people in Pakistan. That shows he considers nation over religion. Godse on the other hand was only concerned about the hindus which is dangerous for our secular country.

Jat said...

Godse, U r greate.....................really.Today we need a leader like u........

Abhi(03bcm001) said...

I read the speech and I read the comments posted by many people. Its still a paradoxical argument "Is Gandhi the reason of partitioning of India?". Still there is no good evidence to affirmatively say either "Yes" or "No".

Firstly NV Godse is not against Muslims. He was driven to hate Muslims because of the the incidents happened in 1940's. Its no mistake of Godse to be born as a Hindu and been attacked by Muslims or see his women been attacked by Muslims.

At the same time, the Muslims were attacked by Hindus brutally which no one can deny. Before partitioning of India, the train when trips from Amritsar to Lahore will have dead bodies of Muslims. And when it comes from Lahore to Amritsar, it will be filled with dead bodies of Hindus.

If NV Godse had born as a Muslim, he would then also murdered Gandhi for the very same reason, but the only difference is that he would have hated Hindus by then. We never know how many Godse's we have at the Muslim side.

Godse strongly felt that Gandhi had never wanted to (politically) intervene in this issue and that led to so many unspeakable brutality towards Hindus.

Gandhi has shown his patriotism in many ways which we all know either by making us aware by force (in schools :-P) or we read it by interest. But there are some deeds of Godse, which probably most may not be aware, but he has proven his patriotism towards his country.

NV Godse felt that Gandhi is the only reason behind partitioning of India and the brutal murders that happened in Gujarat and Bengal at the time of freedom on the name "Transfering power peacefully", an agreement, that shows acceptance to the thoughts of Mohammed Ali Jinnah. So he decided to murder Gandhi and he did. He did not harm anyone else and ran no where. He claimed that he murdered Gandhi in both Maharashtra High court as well as the Supreme court. His last wish was that to burn his body and the ash has to be mixed in River Sindh, when it flows in India! River Sindh is not yet in India, and so Godse's ash has still been kept safe by his descendants, for the day to arrive.

NV Godse wanted India never to be partitioned. He showed his patriotism by taking violence on hand.

P.S.: I am neither a follower of Gandhi nor a supporter of Godse. I just wanted to narrate the history over here :-)

Abhi(03bcm001) said...

Its ironical that I read the posts about Godse on Gandhi Jayanthi. And while reading the comments, I saw many have shown frustruations on the 'Gandhi family'. I would like to provide the history of Gandhi family here.

Indira Gandhi married a person named Feroze Gandhey. It was politics that made Nehru's family believe that they need to use Gandhi's name for the future of Congress. So it was Nehru, his daughter Indira and the congress committee members who decided to have Feroze's lastname to be 'attached' to Indira and her children and to the descendants, so that the family can then be named 'Gandhi family'.

Genuinely Nehru's family had the custom of having lastname with the mother's family name. But with politics involved, Indira Jawaharlal Nehru and everyone belonging to Congress committee, decided to have Indira's lastname as 'Gandhey', which is from her husband's family name. Later, Gandhey became Gandhi, and now Nehru's descendants finally are together called as 'Gandhi family'.

Now we have a question "What happened to the 'actual' Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi's family?". Well, Gandhi had 4 sons - Harilal, Manilal, Ramdas and Devdas. MK Gandhi's grand and great-grand children are alive and the family name is well.

Kumar Priyanshu said...

Listen to this speech here:

http://fundoofriday.blogspot.com/2011/10/nathuram-godses-last-speech-original.html

Frost45 said...

I am a Hindu. But I think that there is no specific definition of right and wrong. There is a quote that your guardian angel will be seen as an avenging demon by your enemy. Most people will not do what they think is completely wrong and unforgivable. So in any action, the doer will mostly believe that he is right.

I respect Gandhi for all that he has done. I respect his ideals and his beliefs and all that he has accomplished. But how many people can say that the partition was correct? Gandhi advocated the unity of Hindus and Muslims and then he contradicted himself by agreeing to the partition. Gandhi had enough power over the Indian population and the British to disagree and have his way. Yet he chose to give away a part of India. If Muslims could get their own state, why did we deny Sikhs? Or today, people want Kashmir to be a separate from India. They should get what they want.

I can relate to some parts of Nathuram Godse's speech and obviously, he has given this matter a lot of thought before taking action. But I believe that the action was wrong.

Like I said, right and wrong is very vague. But everyone has one fundamental belief - killing is wrong.

You may have your own principles, thoughts and opinions. But killing is wrong. If we start believing that killing is justified, what will happen to the world? People kill, sometimes for petty reasons, but also because they believe that they have been wronged. Does that mean what they did is correct? Who will decide which killing is wrong and which is right? According to me, partition was an unnecessary evil that could have been prevented. But Gandhi supported it and so did the Congress. So today, the Congress should give away Kashmir if they wish to follow their own principles.

I have nothing against Hindus and Muslims. Godse, is not asking Gandhi to be unfair to the Muslims. All he wants is for Gandhi to be equal to both. What has partition accomplished? It has broken the fragile unity between Hindus and Muslims. But Godse could have campaigned against it, gone to the press, to the masses. He took matters into his own hands,that too a year after partition.

keesur said...

i liked the truth

keesur said...

long live GHODSE

singh said...

Ghandi was a great leader but he never wann that any other leader be more populer then him. who ever come againest him like Subash chand bose or tilak he beat them by tit or tat because he have more people behind him specially muslims which contribute more than 30% of population at that time, Problem of other leaders was only of muslim support. Hindu population was diveded at that time in various leaders like Tilak, veer saverkar, follower of subash chandra bose , sardar patel and list was endless at that time.Ghandi first take the favour of muslims and hindus( whos favour come through other leaders) and became undisputed leader of india, But as soon as muslims leaders came in politics gandhi loose support of muslims(bcoz muslim first see muslim than other qualities) and to gain that lost support Gandhi did all actions by which he make muslim happy.Even he never speak againest muslim armies attaking hindus in east and west part of india i.e pak and bangladesh. He never sit on hunger strike to protest blood shed of innocent hindus. Gandhi want to beat jinnah in popularity game any how that is why he never protest partition of India openly. In real Ghadhi was not happy by partion but to get support of muslims he keep mum and did every thingh which help to regain muslim support. THE SAME ACT LEARN BY NEHRU VERY WELL AND HE MADE IT POLICY OF CONGRESS TO GET POPULARITY AND SUPPORT OF MUSLIMS AND THEY APPLIED SAME TOOL FROM LAST SIXTY YEAR IN INDIA NOW LOT OF MUSLIM LEADERS AND PARTY IN COMPITITION SO CONGRESS WANT TO GIVE SOME THINGH SPECIAL TO MUSLIMS. HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF AGAIN AND IF WE KEEP TAKING OF GANDHI NOT SUBASH, BHAGAT SINGH, VEER SAVERKAR NO ONE STOP PARTION OF INDIA AGAIN.

Amit Kumar Yadav said...

In my words, will believe that Godse did right Job. just because of ostentatious Movement of Non violence, Millions of Indians brutally killed and millions of Mothers, Fathers, Child's lots their life. There was only one conspiracy behind No violence was To become a Star among public's. He has no interest in India's freedom. if he had then he must have to read our past like Ramayana, Mahabharat, etc. Today, The same congress or Gandhi's has created so many SCAMS. which push India's name into a Heaven of SCAMS. Partitioning only created by Gandhi not by Real Indian or Hindus. To get the sympathy and name fame, he did this.
It's better to proud to be an Indian OR Hindu rather than saying Gandhi's follower. Only coward peoples will think about to get freedom on behalf of Killing millions of peoples except himself.

krishnafollower said...

We should all know that godse is the real martyr who has taken the brave decision to save our nation eventhough he knews that he would gain the curses from every gandhi followers.The martyrs day should be declared as november 15th which is the day he departs from this world.Our nation was not born after the independance but we are the only oldest nation in the world having a history of over millions of years and all of this pride and glory has been dimnished from one partition.Even if gandhi and nehru wouldnt born also we would have got independance but our nation reminds AKHAND BHARAT.Our nation has seen greatest warriors like Lord Rama ,Lord Krishna from previous yugs to Veer Shivaji, bhagat singh,Veer Savarkhar,Subash Chandra bose in the present kaliyug.All these personalities are known for the fight for dharma & not non-violence.Just think if what would happened if we followed nonviolence in wars against china and pakistan.Though gandhi is died his non violence policy is not dead and after 60 years also we are seeing a non violence against naxals,kazab or afzal guru.Atleast we should wake up now ,we should find leaders like Subash chandra bose,Sardar patel to fight against naxals,against pakistan terrorists,against looting politicians to retain our pride and glory which we lost in the past.And believe it or not as per the prophecies from Nostradamus to our Swami Vivekananda, India will become a super power in the future establishing hindu samrajya in the entire world,will retain everything she has lost in the past & becomes AKHAND BHARAT and finally let us all hope that at oneday godse's ash would be spread over Sindh in Akhand bharat...
Jai hind:-)

abhiyshake said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
abhiyshake said...

Today is his B day.

Nepal Tourism Year 2011 said...

Nathu bhai u did what was best 4 the country at that time may u b in rest n peace

SIVA KRISHNA AVUDARI said...

i am sad,only because of read this best speech lately and i understood that gandhi only carries geetha but no morals in geetha. so he make his own style of secular politics, divide the country and destroys the pure congress politics in the name of secular.Bad thing is in books our father is gandhi,not netaji sbhash chndra bose

MANEE MANEESHA said...

I m thankful to mr naturam godse for freeing us from the clutches of so called "MAHATMA"... Proud u.. Great
MAHATMA GANDHI n his so called non violence was d reason for v gt our independence so late.. He was responsible for death bagath singh.
damm u gandhi....

Amit Tiwary said...

"JAB TAK SURAJ CHAND RAHEGA GODSE JI KA NAAM RAHEGA". Kisne kaha aap "MADMAN" the aap to "MAHATMA" the.ish gandhi ki wajah se hame bahut nuksan uthana pada hai par galti sudhari ja sakti hai "narendra modi ko pm bana kar aur second godhra kara kar.
GARV SE KAHEN HUM HINDU HAI
JAI HIND JAI BHARAT

Son Vs Father said...

Those who shed blood for their nation they became sons of the nation ( Bhagat Singh,Azad, Bose,etc ). The person who completely spent his entire life in foreign land ( South Africa ) is known as Father of the nation.
Don't u smell the power of corruption at that time also.

Son Vs Father said...

What History Says:
Those picked up the arms for freedom of mother land r known as Extremist [ Terrorist ] & the person who picked up salt is known as Moderator [ Mahatama - Mahan Atma ]

sumit Shaw said...

It was Gandhi, who supported two nation theory, after which only India was divided into two parts, and over 2 millions innocents had to lose their lives.

R N S said...

Mr Godse is a manifestation of a virulent and rabid mindset that plagues India till date. He is a typical example of a myopic intellectual movement whose foundation is based on flawed premise. Nevertheless, no matter how you shape the Hindutva debate - it remains misguided, regressive, caste-centric, Fascist, and intolerant ideologue based on a belief system that Brahminical faith is superior to all other philosophies, and convoluted/ highly distorted reading of history and projection of ‘Akhand Bharat.’ There is a huge volume of literature which reveals dangerous designs of bodies like RSS. Please read it. It is time that Godse(s) of the world to bow out in favour of a tolerant, pluralistic, and secular world which believes in equitable social justice, equality of genders and people. These Godse(s) of the world exist in every religion, in every corner of the world, inciting carnage, unrest, communal hatred, and instability. The world may survive the ravages of ‘global warming’ – but, it will not survive malicious intent of cancerous Godse(s) ideologue.

MANISH KUMAR Mishra said...

if one had to kill any one for the sake of serving the country, than it can be exuded that he or she is the genuine citizen of genuine country.
As this is true it should not be disappeared from school history books.

MANISH KUMAR Mishra said...

NATHURAM D REAL SON OF INDIA U WL ALWAYS BE WORSHIPPED BY AL D TRU INDIANS FOREVER.

shailabh said...

I was moved by this speech of Godse ji, now I come to realize that the history we learn today is blended according to the traitors of the Motherland - Congress ...Jai Hind

Aditya Dalmia said...

India did follow the jury system until Nanavati versus State of Maharashtra. Godse was a right wing nut. His clarity in his thoughts does not absolve him of his crime any less than Hitler's clarity in his thoughts absolve him of his.

vinaya kumar said...

I am shaken by the truth and surprised that how things have been fabricated by nehru and all ther leader who were in power that time. I t was the hunger of power and popularity of gandhi and nehru that they surrendered in front of jinnah and muslim league and failed to get a united nation. any one who does not agree with mr godse has to understand the real meaning of secularism and minority . it was really eye opening

devesh kumar lakhmani said...

There is no doubt that Nathuram Godse was a true patriot. But this is also a fact that Gandhi was a Mahatma and he believed in the prosperity of mankind. For him the entire nation was a family and the Hindus and the Muslims as his two sons. It is the duty of a father to ask his obedient son to bend in front of the disobedient son in order to run the family. This is a simple thing that he just did. And just because of this he was assassinated. Great Mr. Godse, if you dont agree to someone's ideoligies then take a gun and shoot him. your action has really given a great message and direction to the country and mankind!!

gouri kaushik said...

Godse took a right decision but if everyone start taking this type of decision whole system will be ruin so we should follow a person when he really deserve and never follow blindly.

ram said...

The so called freedom of speech given to us by constitution was subverted by Congress party government from time to time. Even this speech was hidden from public in the name of national security. Only A supreme court verdict could bring it out.The killing of Gandhi by Godse was legally a crime and he was sentenced for it. But Was not Gandhi responsible for partition by accepting the demands of Mohamed Ali Jinnah. Who is responsible for the killing of millions of innocent people immediately after partition. Wasn't Gandhi father of the nation then? Finally Gandhi has to accept partition as the other party's violence won over Gandhi's non violence.

om shanti said...

This is in reply to 'INDIA THIS WEEK' comments....He is an idiot....will anyone like if their country men are killed by other country(pakistan). You need to think strongly on your comments...Youth of this generation knows better...You dont have to teach them. You better learn from United States of America......

CHIDU DATA SERVICES said...

This is bullshit of a cranky murderer
who does not know what is leadership and how a leader has take his team along with for achieving his goals. Such foolish people do not have any right to take a great person's life as they dont have even the slightest understanding of what great work he did and what great methods he taught to the world which even now learns from him . Munnabhai movies clearly depict even today how Gandhian principles can work in any part of the world always for centuries to come . Such Godse like foolish bastards have been born in our country is itself a curse on us . Le almighty not give any mor3e sons of this kind to the world.

Ganesh Raj said...

Gandhi told the Hindus to bend down & show their a*s to the Muslims. And he got some Indian patriots killed for fighting the British. His fasting deeds were simply for his own selfishness, to sell his good name to the gullible public. The Muslims wouldn't have bought his stupid fasting comic shows, because they simply don't care about it. He was totally irresponsible. Should have been stopped earlier to limit the damage done to Bharat. He is simply a duratma.

Nikhil Patriot said...

Respect , Salute and tribute to a great son of hindustan


Nikhil